Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 1104 days newer than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 30% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 3 3250U - 210 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 24 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
210
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.33/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$489
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$489 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Picasso | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |