Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 203 days newer than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 15 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 3 3250U - 247 vs 233 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 20 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
247
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.48/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$611.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$611.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60980 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Single-Core
748
42.98850574712644%
Multi-Core
1447
15.908091468777485%
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |