Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1132 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - CA$142.95 vs CA$258.88
- Up to 40% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i7-6900K - CA$0.74 vs CA$1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 8% better in F1 23 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 208 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 16 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
193
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$142.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$142.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15185 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
208
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.24/FPS
59%
Price, CA$
CA$258.88
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |