Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Ryzen 3 2300U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 1457 days newer than Ryzen 3 2300U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2300U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 9% better in World of Tanks than Ryzen 3 2300U - 561 vs 513 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2300U - 12 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 2300U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2018
Core i5-12400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 8th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
