Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 405 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G3930T - 395 vs 375 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
395
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$280
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |