Buy on Amazon
CA$87.91
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $129
Availability
MSRP in USD: $129
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 205 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 6% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G3930 - 169 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1300X doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 3.5 GHz 8M 65W Socket AM4
Buy for CA$87.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75097 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 1300X
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
55.42388331814039%
Multi-Core
1043
33.03769401330377%
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
