Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6700T outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6700T is 695 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 15% better in Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 3 1200 - 45 vs 39 FPS
- Up to 63% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1200 - CA$238.34 vs CA$649.99
- Up to 68% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 3 1200 - CA$5.3 vs CA$16.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$649.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
45
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.3/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$238.34
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$238.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |