Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 4223 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 95 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 30% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Phenom X4 9550 - 134 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 24 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for CA$543.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
13.970149253731343%
Multi-Core
712
6.273680500484624%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i9-10920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Agena | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 165 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |