Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 4492 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Phenom X4 9550 - 219 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 32 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
219
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$8.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1800
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,800 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2977 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
13.961813842482101%
Multi-Core
712
5.763782077228203%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Agena | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 280 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |