Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 3432 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 12% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Phenom II X4 925 - 130 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 24 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
130
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.61/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$988.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$988.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Deneb | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |