Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms FX-9370 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1105 days newer than FX-9370.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 26% better in War Thunder than FX-9370 - 167 vs 133 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 140 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9370 - 12 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
FX-9370
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| FX | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 220 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
