Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms FX-9370 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1479 days newer than FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 2% better in Valheim than FX-9370 - 194 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 180 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9370 - 64 vs 8 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
FX-9370
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | EPYC |
| Vishera | Codename | Naples |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 32 |
| 8 | Threads | 64 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 220 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
