Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 2947 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - CA$220.0 vs CA$609.0
- Up to 58% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-13900KF - CA$1.72 vs CA$4.06 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 17% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-8370 - 150 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 32 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
128
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.72/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$220
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$220 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
150
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.06/FPS
42%
Price, CA$
CA$609
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$609 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |