Buy on Amazon
CA$400
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $539
Availability
MSRP in USD: $539
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 2387 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 12% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-8320E - 187 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-11900K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
187
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$400
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-11900K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.3 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 125W
Buy for CA$400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13256 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i9-11900K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| FX | Collection | Core i9 |
| Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
