Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7960X outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7960X is 1774 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-7960X - CA$83.46 vs CA$709.99
- Up to 88% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-7960X - CA$0.5 vs CA$4.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-7960X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7960X
- Performs up to 5% better in Deathloop than FX-8300 - 177 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 32 vs 8 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
168
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3231 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
FPS
177
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.01/FPS
12%
Price, CA$
CA$709.99
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$709.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3235 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i9-7960X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |