Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2552 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - CA$83.46 vs CA$835.0
- Up to 90% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i9-10900X - CA$0.47 vs CA$4.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than FX-8300 - 183 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 20 vs 8 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
178
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3242 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
183
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.56/FPS
10%
Price, CA$
CA$835
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$835 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3248 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Vishera | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |