Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600K outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2600K is 276 days older than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i7-2600K - CA$87.12 vs CA$188.88
- Up to 51% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Core i7-2600K - CA$0.82 vs CA$1.69 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Performs up to 6% better in Grand Theft Auto V than FX-8150 - 112 vs 106 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
106
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.82/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
112
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.69/FPS
48%
Price, CA$
CA$188.88
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |