Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3470 outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3470 is 332 days older than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than FX-6350 - 112 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for CA$147.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75060 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i5-3470 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |