Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G4400 outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G4400 is 1043 days newer than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 6% better in Dirt 5 than FX-6300 - 149 vs 140 FPS
- Up to 38% cheaper than FX-6300 - CA$36.99 vs CA$59.57
- Up to 42% better value when playing Dirt 5 than FX-6300 - CA$0.25 vs CA$0.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
149
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Pentium |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |