Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7500T outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7500T is 1533 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i5-7500T - CA$59.57 vs CA$98.89
- Up to 36% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-7500T - CA$0.54 vs CA$0.84 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than FX-6300 - 118 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
111
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$59.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
118
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.84/FPS
64%
Price, CA$
CA$98.89
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$98.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |