Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4670 is 222 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i5-4670 - CA$59.57 vs CA$128.63
- Up to 49% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-4670 - CA$0.24 vs CA$0.47 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Performs up to 8% better in F1 22 than FX-6300 - 271 vs 252 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 84 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
252
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$59.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
271
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.47/FPS
51%
Price, CA$
CA$128.63
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$128.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 84 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |