Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 2047 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 26% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-6200 - 552 vs 439 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
552
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$177.81
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$177.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12059 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |