Buy on Amazon
CA$120.26
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600K outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-2600K is 841 days older than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i7-2600K - CA$120.26 vs CA$170.45
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than FX-4350 - 170 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
CPU Processor FX-Series FX4350 FX-4350 FX 4350 4.2 GHz 125W Quad-Core CPU Processor FD4350FRW4KHK Socket AM3+ Good Performance, high Efficiency, Clear Picture
Buy for CA$120.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-2600K Quad-Core Processor 3.4 Ghz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I72600K,Black
Buy for CA$170.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Core i7-2600K
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
|---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
