Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 2401 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - CA$120.26 vs CA$2200.0
- Up to 94% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - CA$1.05 vs CA$16.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 125 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 17% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-4350 - 134 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 64 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
115
85.82089552238806%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.05/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$120.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$120.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40898 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$16.42/FPS
6.394640682095005%
Price, CA$
CA$2200
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$2,200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40904 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 280 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |