Buy on Amazon
CA$120.26
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1299
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 1982 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - CA$120.26 vs CA$1791.28
- Up to 92% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - CA$0.78 vs CA$9.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 125 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 21% better in Rust than FX-4350 - 187 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 48 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
155
82.88770053475936%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$120.26
100%
Value Winner
CPU Processor FX-Series FX4350 FX-4350 FX 4350 4.2 GHz 125W Quad-Core CPU Processor FD4350FRW4KHK Socket AM3+ Good Performance, high Efficiency, Clear Picture
Buy for CA$120.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41950 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
187
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$9.58/FPS
8.1419624217119%
Price, CA$
CA$1791.28
6%
FPS Winner
AMD YD297XAZAFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 24 Core, 48 Thread Processor, Pack of 1
Buy for CA$1,791.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41954 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Vishera | Codename | Colfax |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 48 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 250 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
