Key Differences
In short — FX-4350 outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4350 is 188 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 6 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$66.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75748 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-4350 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |