Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2700K outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2700K is 365 days older than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i7-2700K - CA$36.09 vs CA$135.68
- Up to 73% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i7-2700K - CA$0.16 vs CA$0.59 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Performs up to 3% better in Lost Ark than FX-4300 - 230 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
223
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
230
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.59/FPS
27%
Price, CA$
CA$135.68
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$135.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |