Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600K outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600K is 1533 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i5-7600K - CA$36.09 vs CA$235.0
- Up to 82% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Core i5-7600K - CA$0.4 vs CA$2.28 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Performs up to 13% better in Sons Of The Forest than FX-4300 - 103 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 91 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
91
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
103
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.28/FPS
17%
Price, CA$
CA$235
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i5-7600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 91 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |