Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1533 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - CA$36.09 vs CA$85.99
- Up to 56% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-7100 - CA$0.19 vs CA$0.43 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-4300 - 202 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
190
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
202
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.43/FPS
44%
Price, CA$
CA$85.99
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$85.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |