Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 267 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600K - 128 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than EPYC 7742 - 205 vs 198 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 95 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
205
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.15/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$234.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$234.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Rome | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 6 |
128 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |