Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 1256 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 128 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 9% better in Dead Space than EPYC 7742 - 164 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 65 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
164
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.7/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$278.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$278.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Rome | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 6 |
128 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |