Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Pentium Gold G5400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 277 days older than Pentium Gold G5400.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Pentium Gold G5400 - 98 vs 95 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G5400 - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G5400
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 58 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
95
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$113.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$113.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G5400 |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
EPYC | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Naples | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |