Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2087 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 2% better in Dead Space than FX-8150 - 147 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 125 vs 180 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
144
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
EPYC | Collection | FX |
Naples | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 8 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |