Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1143 days older than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 120 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 1% better in HITMAN 2 than EPYC 7282 - 135 vs 134 FPS
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| EPYC | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Rome | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
