Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Core i7-5600U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 1620 days newer than Core i7-5600U.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 6% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-5600U - 352 vs 332 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5600U - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5600U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 15 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i7-5600U |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
Rome | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 15 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 5500 |
No | Overclockable | No |