Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 696 days older than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 120 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-7920X - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than EPYC 7282 - 234 vs 232 FPS
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
234
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.57/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$600.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Rome | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |