Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 772 days older than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 120 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-7900X - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EPYC 7282 - 187 vs 182 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Rome | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |