Key Differences
In short — Core i7-1068NG7 outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-1068NG7 is 6 days older than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-1068NG7 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-1068NG7
- Performs up to 4% better in Sea of Thieves than EPYC 7282 - 240 vs 231 FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 28 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i7-1068NG7
Mobile • Aug 1st, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i7-1068NG7 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2019 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
| Rome | Codename | Ice Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1526 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 28 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Iris Plus |
| No | Overclockable | No |
