Key Differences
In short — ASUS ROG Strix G16CH outperforms EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of ASUS ROG Strix G16CH Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 10% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than EMCA4 - 217 vs 197 FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
8th Variation
55th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 3090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
556 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
55th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
83%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
82%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
8th Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
CPU Winner
55th Variation
Core i5-14600KF
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2769
89%
Multi-Core
15636
74%
ASUS ROG Strix G16CH Gaming Desktop PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900K | CPU | Core i5-14600KF |
| GeForce RTX 3090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD + 20 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
