Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation outperforms Dell XPS 8960 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Dell XPS 8960 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 94% better in Rocket League than Dell XPS 8960 - 670 vs 346 FPS
Advantages of Dell XPS 8960 Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 21% better value when playing Rocket League than Adamant Custom 24-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - CA$4.76 vs CA$6.05 per FPS
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
FPS
670
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.05/FPS
79%
Price, CA$
FPS Winner
95th Variation
FPS
346
52%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.76/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
Value Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
95th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
95th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
42%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
31%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
95th Variation
Core i7-13700
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2632
89%
Multi-Core
14759
73%
Adamant Custom 24-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Dell XPS 8960 Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Core i7-13700 |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB HDD |