Key Differences
In short — MSI Crosshair 16 outperforms Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing MSI Crosshair 16 is 27 days older than Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72.
Advantages of MSI Crosshair 16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 22% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 - 89 vs 73 FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Dec 5th, 2023 • 2nd Variation
FPS
89
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Dec 5th, 2023 • 2nd Variation
Jan 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Dec 5th, 2023 • 2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Jan 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Dec 5th, 2023 • 2nd Variation
Core i9-12900
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2525
100%
Multi-Core
13234
100%
CPU Winner
Jan 1st, 2024
Core i7-14650HX
2.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2434
96%
Multi-Core
13285
100%
MSI Crosshair 16 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 Gaming Laptop |
---|---|---|
Dec 5th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2024 |
Core i9-12900 | CPU | Core i7-14650HX |
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
16" | Screen Size | 16" |