The Radeon R9 270X is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX Vega 56. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270X
- Consumes up to 14% less energy – 180 vs 210 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX Vega 56
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon RX Vega 56 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
51
59%
Min 1% FPS
23
50%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX Vega 56
Aug 14th, 2017
Average FPS
86
100%
Min 1% FPS
46
100%
Price, CA$
CA$838.42
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$9.74/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon RX Vega 56 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon RX Vega 56 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon RX Vega 56 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
44%
Pixel Fillrate
33.6 GPixel/s
36%
Texture Fillrate
84 GTexel/s
25%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
26%
Radeon RX Vega 56
Aug 14th, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
409.6 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
94.14 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
329.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
10.54 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 14th, 2017 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Vega |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
180 W | Power Consumption | 210 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | HBM2 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 2048-bit |
| 179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 409.6 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 33.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 94.14 GPixel/s |
| 84 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 329.5 GTexel/s |
| 2.688 TFLOPS | FP32 | 10.54 TFLOPS |
