The Radeon R9 270X is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon PRO W7500. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270X
The Radeon PRO W7500 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon PRO W7500
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 70 vs 180 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon PRO W7500 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
51
61%
Min 1% FPS
23
51%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
84
100%
Min 1% FPS
45
100%
Price, CA$
CA$658.99
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.84/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon PRO W7500 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon PRO W7500 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon PRO W7500 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
33.6 GPixel/s
31%
Texture Fillrate
84 GTexel/s
44%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
22%
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
172 GB/s
96%
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.19 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $429.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 180 W | Power Consumption | 70 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 172 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 33.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 108.8 GPixel/s |
| 84 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 190.4 GTexel/s |
| 2.688 TFLOPS | FP32 | 12.19 TFLOPS |
