The Radeon R7 260 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 95 vs 220 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 260 vs GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 260
Dec 17th, 2013
Average FPS
47
28%
Min 1% FPS
20
19%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
167
100%
Min 1% FPS
103
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1499.99
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$8.98/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,499.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Radeon R7 260 vs GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 260 vs GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 260 vs GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 260
Dec 17th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
17%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
19%
Pixel Fillrate
16 GPixel/s
8%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
9%
FP32
1.536 TFLOPS
4%
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Jan 8th, 2024
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
504.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
35.48 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 260 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 17th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$109.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
95 W | Power Consumption | 220 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 12 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 16 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 198 GPixel/s |
| 48 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 554.4 GTexel/s |
| 1.536 TFLOPS | FP32 | 35.48 TFLOPS |
