The Radeon R7 260 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A750. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 95 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Arc A750
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 260 vs Arc A750 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 260
Dec 17th, 2013
Average FPS
47
39%
Min 1% FPS
20
28%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
122
100%
Min 1% FPS
71
100%
Price, CA$
CA$369.99
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.03/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$369.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$389.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$409.85
In Stock
Radeon R7 260 vs Arc A750 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 260 vs Arc A750 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 260 vs Arc A750 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 260
Dec 17th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
19%
Pixel Fillrate
16 GPixel/s
6%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
9%
FP32
1.536 TFLOPS
9%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 260 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 17th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
$109.00 | MSRP | $289.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
95 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 16 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 268.8 GPixel/s |
| 48 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 537.6 GTexel/s |
| 1.536 TFLOPS | FP32 | 17.2 TFLOPS |
