The Radeon R7 240 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 550. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 240
- Consumes up to 40% less energy – 30 vs 50 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 550
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon RX 550 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
41
87%
Min 1% FPS
16
80%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Average FPS
47
100%
Min 1% FPS
20
100%
Price, CA$
CA$152.99
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.25/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$152.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$132.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$102.76
In Stock
Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon RX 550 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon RX 550 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon RX 550 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
73.6 GB/s
66%
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
30%
Texture Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
37%
FP32
448 GFLOPS
37%
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
18.93 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
37.86 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.211 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 240 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2017 |
$69.00 | MSRP | $79.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 73.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 5.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 18.93 GPixel/s |
| 14 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 37.86 GTexel/s |
| 448 GFLOPS | FP32 | 1.211 TFLOPS |
