The Radeon R7 240 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 240
- Consumes up to 60% less energy – 30 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
41
75%
Min 1% FPS
16
64%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
55
100%
Min 1% FPS
25
100%
Price, CA$
CA$178
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.23/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$178.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$400.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$505.19
In Stock
Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
73.6 GB/s
66%
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
13%
Texture Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
21%
FP32
448 GFLOPS
21%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.138 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 240 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
$69.00 | MSRP | $139.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 73.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 5.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 44.54 GPixel/s |
| 14 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 66.82 GTexel/s |
| 448 GFLOPS | FP32 | 2.138 TFLOPS |
