Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 2100 outperforms the cheaper Radeon R5 240 OEM on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon R5 240 OEM is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 2100 is 1311 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R5 240 OEM.
Advantages of Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Up to 26% cheaper than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - CA$152.65 vs CA$206.80
- Up to 23% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - CA$0.54 vs CA$0.70 per FPS
Advantages of Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Radeon R5 240 OEM - 297 vs 284 FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM - 35 vs 50 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
FPS
284
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$152.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$152.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 383 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
FPS
297
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.7/FPS
77%
Price, CA$
CA$206.8
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$206.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 384 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
32%
Texel Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
48%
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R5 240 OEM | vs | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
730 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
780 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |