The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A770 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only CA$274.99 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 57% cheaper – CA$205.00 vs CA$479.99
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 65 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Arc A770
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Arc A770 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Average FPS
49
38%
Min 1% FPS
21
28%
Price, CA$
CA$205
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.18/FPS
89%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
128
100%
Min 1% FPS
75
100%
Price, CA$
CA$479.99
42%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.74/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$479.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$490.47
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$499.81
In Stock
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Arc A770 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Arc A770 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Arc A770 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
19%
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
7%
Texture Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
7%
FP32
1.658 TFLOPS
8%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
65 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 20.72 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 307.2 GPixel/s |
| 41.44 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 614.4 GTexel/s |
| 1.658 TFLOPS | FP32 | 19.66 TFLOPS |
