The Arc A770 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce 210 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only CA$263.30 more expensive!
Advantages of the Arc A770
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 3100% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 0 GB
Advantages of the GeForce 210
- Up to 55% cheaper – CA$216.69 vs CA$479.99
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 31 vs 225 Watts
Arc A770 vs GeForce 210 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
128
100%
Min 1% FPS
75
100%
Price, CA$
CA$479.99
45%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.74/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$479.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$494.32
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$499.81
In Stock
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Average FPS
40
31%
Min 1% FPS
15
20%
Price, CA$
CA$216.69
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.41/FPS
69%
Arc A770 vs GeForce 210 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Arc A770 vs GeForce 210 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Arc A770 vs GeForce 210 in core GPU performance specifications
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
3%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
1%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
1%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
1%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
0%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Arc A770 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce 210 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
| $329.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 225 W | Power Consumption | 31 W |
| Memory | ||
16 GB | Memory Size | 0.5 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | DDR3 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
307.2 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 2.08 GPixel/s |
614.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 4.16 GTexel/s |
19.66 TFLOPS | FP32 | 39.36 GFLOPS |
